Friday, May 24th 2013, 12:40pm UTC+2

You are not logged in.

  • Login

1

Wednesday, May 30th 2012, 8:42pm

Virus B sound differences in single vs multi mode

Hi all,

first post here! I just picked up a used virus b and I'm starting (slowly) to learn the workflow. One thing I'm confused about is that when designing and editing sounds in single mode, I get used to how they sound there, but then when assigned to a multi part they sound different. At first I thought it was just the effects section because delay is shared, but even after making all of the settings identical for effects, the sounds still are quite different. In single mode, the sound has a depth and richness, lots of stereo spread and bass that is gone when playing the same sound as a multi part. Any ideas why that is or how to get around it? Is it possible there are other global settings that might be at fault?

thanks a bunch!
roland

dantyrant

Unregistered

2

Thursday, May 31st 2012, 9:33am

Hi Roland -- Is this just a volume difference that's making you perceive all of these differences? Have you run any sort of spectral tests to confirm these suspicions? Just the first thoughts that came to mind.

I would try A/B'ing different patches in single vs multi mode. I would defeat the reverb/delay(turn the knob to dry) so as to eliminate this as a source of error. Adjust your multi part volume so that the multi and single are playing at roughly the same level. And then see if they sound different. If they do, try recording the results and comparing(use analytic tools, if you have them). If they're truly different, send them to Access support.

I suspect the global reverb/delay settings across the Multi are having more of an effect than you think. This was certainly my experience when I got my C.

Hope this helps.

Dan

3

Thursday, May 31st 2012, 4:25pm

Hi Dan,

thanks for the quick reply! I wondered about volume, but did my best to equalize that between the two. I also suspect that reverb / delay is the culprit, but as I said, I went step by step through all the effects parameters and made the exactly the same. I think that your idea of recording each is probably the best thing to do. To my ears, it sounds almost like an EQ / stereo mix issue... The sound in single sounds huge with lots of bass and headroom, whereas the sound in multi mode sounds sort of harsh and dry. That's why I was wondering if perhaps even with the delay settings being equal there might be a difference in the effects chain or the way they're processed that makes the sounds different.

Not to put the cart before the horse, but I'm curious; if this is the case and the reality for working with a virus, what's the best workflow? Do you audition sounds within multi patches instead of singles to get a true listen to how it will sound when used in your song? That seems cumbersome to me, but using the virus in single mode is just not an option once a song begins to take shape.

thanks again for your help! I'll try to post up some recordings for comparison.

best,
roland

dantyrant

Unregistered

4

Friday, June 1st 2012, 7:24am

Roland --

If I'm not mistaken, the reverb from parts 2-16 are applied through part 1. I'm not sure if the send volumes are affected by the part volumes themselves, but this could definitely be doing things with your reverb/delay to some degree either way.

At first, I was a bit put off by this as you likely are. I would go through banks in Single mode and save them to a 'favorites' bank, and they would just never sound the same when I wanted to use them for a track. Soon I accepted that I couldn't have them all sounding the same. I just learned to work around this limitation though. I like the sound of the Virus reverb(particularly the Reverb+Feedback algorithms) to give a sense of space, but it's not my go-to reverb, so I've started applying many of my effects in-the-box. I'll tend to use the virus reverb for swells and over-the-top reverb rather than for subtle ambience, though it can do that too. When I work in multi mode I'll usually turn down the reverb for every patch and then dial back an amount that sounds like 'enough' for me to move on to other things. (If I know it's there, I'll leave it till I'm finished more important details.)

Other quirks of my workflow: When in multi mode, I don't use stereo outputs unless I need to(for things like pads or fx) which gives me more outputs to use and thus more routing options with plugins in Live/Logic, where I can insert or bus out to plugin reverb/delay/compression etc. I may layer patches in my Multi too, as the Virus sounds great when layering patches: If you haven't tried this, do it! Sometimes when I want stereo I'll create slightly different versions of the same patch and send them to different mono outputs, and them pan them differently in the stereo field, group them in Logic and add modulation effects, etc. This uses more voices than Virus stereo but it offers more interesting possibilities for the additional voice/cpu cost.

In my experience(which, I should say, isn't *that* extensive but it's all that I have) the sound that you described is the sound of an analog synth without effects. They sound harsh, dry, buzzy and raw. The Virus sounds better than most in this regard, but it still has a harshness to it before you apply effects. The more you use it, the more you'll learn how to make it sound the way you want. Video tutorials are helpful, like this one from Kamui : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIUluK8OFNM