Dear visitor, you are currently not logged in. Login or Register as a new user .
The worst part is that Access not keep their consumers happy by telling them at least what stage they are on development.
People complain about T.C. Eletronic but compared to what i experience here with Access the consumers from T.C. should be happy with the exellent service they provided from the start of development to the release of the 64bit supported softwarepackages wich i was betatester of.
Hope these topics give them the idea they have to be transparant to their consumers.
People complain about T.C. Eletronic but compared to what i experience here with Access the consumers from T.C. should be happy with the exellent service they provided from the start of development to the release of the 64bit supported softwarepackages wich i was betatester of.
Hope these topics give them the idea they have to be transparant to their consumers.
Nah, i'm not happy with TC at all - they flat out refuse to support FL Studio.
Yeah - a list of objectives and progress on them from access would be nice, but I figure they aren't a huge operation so they don't need the fuss of
'is it ready yet? IS IT READY YET!?!?' etc.
From everyone for support of an OS that isnt itself 'ready'. ( I discount Vista and XP x64 from this as they, as far as i'm concerned, are not 'ready').
Yeah - a list of objectives and progress on them from access would be nice, but I figure they aren't a huge operation so they don't need the fuss of
'is it ready yet? IS IT READY YET!?!?' etc.
From everyone for support of an OS that isnt itself 'ready'. ( I discount Vista and XP x64 from this as they, as far as i'm concerned, are not 'ready').